lipby ([info]lipbylipby) wrote,
@ 2009-07-01 19:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Too many words about Michael Jackson
As the 1980s wore on and the sociopathic aura of Reaganism settled over my little suburban street, I remember feeling deeply cheated to have grown up in the eighties. Veterans of previous decades spoke longingly—if annoyingly—about the thrill of living in stirring, decadent times, but I was reasonably sure that the only great adventure offered by this decade was a siege mentality of the few who cared surrounded by the many who didn’t.

By 1984, the decade's fun New Wave early years were over, replaced by a pop culture that seemed formed from an especially noxious and gooey mix of bubblegum and silicone. What wasn't schlocky and insipid (E.T.) seemed vicious and shallow (Andrew Dice Clay) and the Reagan Revolution seemed to give an entire nation permission to let out its inner slick dickhead.

It's possible, of course, that my alienation had nothing to do with the culture. Perhaps I had simply become sufficiently adult, and therefore hip to the world, to become appropriately cynical. It's possible that Americans had always been as shallow and selfish as they suddenly appeared to me around the time of Reagan's re-election, only I had grown out of my puerile Disney-ish fantasies of a nation of people who shared certain humane beliefs.





Growing up in the 70s, my brother had a plastic peace sign dangling from the ceiling of the bedroom we shared, though it may have symbolized bong hits more than anything more enlightened. It still seems to me, however, that the 80s were the decade when people finally gave up on having the least thoughts of anything like "the public good," withdrawing to their sanctuaries of late night cable, doing lines of coke off Poison CD cases, and whacking off to some seriously deranged free market fantasies.

You could neither say the 80s were good to be enjoyable nor so dramatically bad as to be interesting. It was just something to muddle through until something else came along. (This isn't to say that some great music wasn't made in the 80s, but one common thread to that music was a collective alienation.)

Perhaps because he had always seemed too effete to do anything as badass as OD, the death of Michael Jackson took me by genuine surprise. But after I processed the fact, registering his death as perhaps the least appealing pop star personality to OD since that guy from Blind Melon, what I was left with was the music—music that brought back to me the whole of the 80s in one hair sprayed, sequined, overly shoulder-padded swoop.

There has been nonstop talk about Michael Jackson all week. At one point, I was walking down Snyder Avenue when I heard three cars in a row playing Michael Jackson. Earlier today, I was behind two burly union-looking guys who were talking about MJ. "Yeah, he was really talented,” said one with an accent that sounded like it should have been coming from under the hood of a car. “Not really my thing, you know—but a very talented guy."

Now I understand the power of pop music as well as anyone. I am, I confess, a sucker for a catchy tune. I recently listened to “Come on Eileen” four times in a row. I contend that good pop songs—even the dumb ones—are important. They give people a common point of reference, allowing people of the same age to sync their nostalgia with that of millions of others. Inescapably, the Michael Jackson phenomenon was something our generation shared. We all can remember how lame the tough guys looked in the video or “Beat It” and we all can remember the creepiness of the Vincent Price intro to "Thriller."

Still, in the donut hole of the 80s emptiness—at the very center of the falseness and selfishness of the mid-80s—there will always be Michael Jackson. He was, undoubtedly, a superstar—creating a string of songs that ingratiated themselves into your brain like some sort of repetitive fever dream. But for all of his fame, Michael Jackson’s music never seemed to carry much in the terms of cultural meaning.

Unlike Elvis, who brought black music to white America, or the Beatles, who absolutely destroyed the limits of what was possible in pop music, Michael Jackson seemed to be mostly about… acting as butch as possible while wearing silk, sequined shirts. Thematically, he tended towards gestures of faux toughness and masculinity— note the lyrics of “Bad” and his many videos involving dancing gang members. If anything, his accomplishment is letting Quincy Jones add some rock edges to a disco beat.

In the end, I would never discount someone’s grieving over a musician they admired. They have their Michael Jackson, and I have mine. (Note: “My” Michael Jackson loved molesting little boys.) And they have their 80s, and I have mine. But for me, the essential falseness of Michael Jackson mirrored the essential falseness of the 1980s—and there are some limits to my sorrow over the passing of an icon of a benighted age.



(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]villagecharm
2009-07-02 12:30 am UTC (link)
This is very well done. Especially this insight:

Still, in the donut hole of the 80s emptiness—at the very center of the falseness and selfish of the mid-80s—there will always be Michael Jackson

I wish I had more to add than just an "Awesome, dude," but seriously: Awesome, dude.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-02 12:38 am UTC (link)
Thanks, Charm. I felt like saying an obvious thing that most people are too polite to mention.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]villagecharm
2009-07-02 12:42 am UTC (link)
I don't think it's so obvious. A lot of people want to make him into something more profound, just because he's one of the last stars that everyone - black, white, young, old, etc. - recognizes. But I think you're right that the only content of his act was his own stardom - and, after awhile, that's all he sang about, too.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-02 12:43 am UTC (link)
Not to mention, I will never quite forgive MJ for changing pop music from a direction I liked (Talking Heads, Police, Madness) towards a direction I detested (a bunch of crappy dance tunes that seemed to clog the airwaves in the late 80s.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]villagecharm
2009-07-02 12:48 am UTC (link)
If only Prince had been as big. I think he was too weird, though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-02 01:25 am UTC (link)
I was a big Prince fan-- and felt he brought something unique to the table. He certainly had his moment. The first I heard of him was from my sister, who said he could dance as well as Michael Jackson AND play guitar!

If it had been Prince who dies, I would have been genuinely bothered-- though one suspects that, underneath all the androgynous whimsy, Prince is a guy who knows how to take care of business.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]morganaus
2009-07-02 02:32 am UTC (link)
Yes, definitely. I'm with you on this...and the whole thing, really.

Very well written, very eloquently expressed, and a genuine pleasure to read. A+++++, would MJ again!!1

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-02 02:39 am UTC (link)
Thanks, Morganaus. It's amazing how often people tell me how great the 80s were because they liked, oh, Peter Murphy or The Cure. And I always look at them and think: Were you in the least bit paying attention to the general suck going on all around you?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]morganaus
2009-07-02 02:48 am UTC (link)
It was a time to revel in being shallow--the Seventies' "Me Decade" had nothing on the Eighties. I mean, c'mon, we wore day-glo jelly shoes for fuck's sake. I'm not sure where that fits in, but it's got to somewhere.

But seriously, talk about your rampant consumerism over cheap, throw-away shit. It kind of set the stage for all the massive credit card debt, today's sense of entitlement, and the recent collapse of the economy. Thanks, America...but at least we'll still have Prince! ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]villagecharm
2009-07-02 03:33 pm UTC (link)
That's the thing. You could take the records sold by the Eighties bands I love and add them together and you're still probably only half way to what Wang Chung sold. Minor Threat and Operation Ivy were not the sound of the Eighties; Chris de Burgh and Richard Marx were.

Except in rap, where there were a lot of popular groups that were fantastic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-07-02 02:16 pm UTC (link)
Whatever one thinks about his music and his subsequent decline, 1980s era Michael Jackson deserves credit for his enormous contribution to making black people less scary and alien to white America. Because of him, an entire generation of suburban kids grew up being able to conceive of the then-revolutionary idea that black could be cool. One could argue that it was necessary for his music to be insipid enough and lowest-common-denominator enough in order for this to happen. I think the international popularity of hip hop and R&B today owes a hell of a lot to MJ. I think there's a good reason for the expressions of sadness in the African American community, even from those who think MJ was a self-hating freak; I can only imagine how big of a deal it must have been to a black kid born in the 70s, when white America was basically shitting its pants in its fear of urban blacks, and becoming an adolescent in the 80s, that the entire world's favorite person was a black man for a while.

He also revolutionized dance, the music video, etc. I would argue that he didn't hijack good music so much as let r&b and dance music have its day beyond the disco pigeonhole. It may not have been your thing (it wasn't mine), but that doesn't mean it was unequivocally crap music.

I've never been an admirer of Michael Jackson, but I personally think he (or more accurately, the effect he had on our society as a phenomenon) deserves a bit more appreciation.

-Ten Feet

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]the_sikh_geek
2009-07-02 02:28 pm UTC (link)
"his enormous contribution to making black people less scary and alien"

Yeah, because if anything, MJ got LESS scary and alien over time. And nothing affirms being African-American like bleaching your skin, getting plastic surgery to remove any distinctive African-American features in your face, and to "have children" through white sperm donors and surrogates.

Was it REALLY breaking down barriers by having an African-American who could sing and dance make white America feel more comfortable? Stevie Wonder, Fats Domino, Little Richard...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-07-02 03:06 pm UTC (link)
Read the words I wrote in my comment, not the ones you want to put in there. I was talking about Michael Jackson in his heyday in the 80s. Yeah, as it turns out, he revealed himself to be, as I put it, a self-hating freak. That doesn't mean he wasn't an important cultural phenomenon.

The other musicians you list are greats, but the appreciation of them was ghettoized, so to speak, in genres like Motown, blues, etc. Michael Jackson was at the top of the mainstream, which was a big deal for a black artist at the time.

I wouldn't suggest that anyone would have to approve of the image he portrayed. But I would maintain that MJ was definitely not a minstrel. White kids liked him not because he reinforced their notions of blackness or their sense of their racial superiority, as a minstrel would, but because they wanted to be him or kiss him.

OK, yeah, he was a singer and dancer. What, black people are only allowed to have significance when they do traditionally non-black things like golfing or becoming President? So if blacks do stereotypical things like sports or entertainment, they can only be considered significant if they are threatening or angry?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-02 07:34 pm UTC (link)
The appreciation of Fats Domino and Stevie Wonder were ghettoized? Really? They were huge. Stevie Wonder had 34 top ten UK/US singles in his career. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Wonder) Michael Jackson had 29 US top ten singles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Records_and_achievements_of_Michael_Jackson#Jackson.27s_US_Top_10_Hits). Their popularity over the course of their career is certainly comparable, though Wonder's artistic achievements vastly exceed Jackson's.

As I wrote, black kids growing up in the 70s have their Michael Jackson. I can't and wouldn't stop them from ascribing any sort of cultural meaning they see fit to MJ. All I am saying is that, as a veteran of the 80s, I find his appeal extremely meretricious.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-07-03 03:01 am UTC (link)
I would say that Stevie Wonder etc. were seen as black musicians who had mainstream success. MJ, on the other hand, was a superstar who happened to be black. It was kind of a big deal.

"Appeal" is stretching it for me. I don't think I like Michael Jackson's oeuvre all that much more than you do. It's just that his place of importance in American cultural history is deserved. Thankfully, I don't have to like him or his music to grant him that.

-Ten Feet

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-03 05:06 pm UTC (link)
I will stipulate his cultural impact. But I stand by my statement that the 80s were horrendous and that MJ was a perfect icon of a empty and desolate historical moment.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hazmat70000
2009-07-03 03:38 pm UTC (link)
You're dead on about MJ, Bob. Fantastically said.

I remember in the eighties thinking of MJ as a jerkily dancing androgyne. He seemed one on hand fey and unthreatening, on the other dangerously naive and somehow off. Public Enemy scared me, as a somewhat sheltered suburbanite, but they at least seemed like human beings. Well, Chuck D did, anyway.

When the Thriller video came out, I loved the zombies but laughed when MJ said, "I'm not like other guys." No shit!

He was a distinctly freakish celebrity who was undeniably multi-talented. His relationships with children and childhood were at best wrong-headed and at worst, corrupt and criminal.

And eventually the freakishness overwhelmed the talent. He looked like a dead white woman for the last ten to fifteen years of his strange life, and behaved not like a man-child, but like an idiot. He went beyond eccentricity 'til it was hard to locate a trace of humanity. Much of this can be laid at the feet of his brutish mess of a plasticky father; the rest at the feet of fame.

The Onion had a headline - "Last piece of Michael Jackson dies." I thought that was very apt.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lipbylipby
2009-07-03 05:26 pm UTC (link)
That is a great Onion quote! Terrific.

I had been entirely in sync with pop culture until MJ. But with Thriller, I suddenly found myself going one way and mass culture the other. I still think that everyone wanted to be a MJ fan because they thought that everyone else already was.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…